Contract Law - Best endeavours

What this page is about: By Sara Partington and Kirk Page. A party who agrees a clause which is stated to be to use “reasonable endeavours” may in fact unwittingly be agreeing to a considerably more onerous burden than it expected.

Commercial contracts will often include the requirement to use “best” or “reasonable” endeavours to act in a certain manner or to effect a particular action or result; such a requirement will limit or define a party's contractual obligations.

Despite the regularity in which these clauses are used, neither has an exact legal definition—every lawyer or commercial man knows that “reasonableness” is difficult to define exactly and is inherently fact-specific.

However, the High Court's judgments in Rhodia International Holdings Ltd v Huntsman International LLC [2007] EWHC 292 (Comm), [2007] All ER (D) 264 (Feb) and Ryanair Ltd v SR Technics Ireland Ltd [2007] EWHC 3089 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 345 (Dec) should be borne in mind as providing some useful guidance, not only regarding the distinction between these stated obligations, but also regarding the extent to which a party will be expected to “sacrifice its own commercial interests” as a result of agreeing to perform to a specified standard.

To view the rest of this page, you must be logged in. Please log in or register - it's free, it takes less than 30 seconds and your details are safe.

Forgot your password? Lost password

Not yet registered? Register now - it's free and takes less than 30 seconds!

Log in

Your email address:

Your password:

(case sensitive)

Also in this section: